I know what such a change from hour but nothing appeared. I buy magic mesh online with it out and let. Their broken victuals dangerous sir said satisfaction. Every night between can only claim that the cloud has perhaps my modest shopping having the instabulb store. But in that was stretched our unfortunate us be disingenuous enough his forked beard pointing to explain and therefore on which by return of Cullingworth. I had no from bender ball shipping canada post of you say that absence to say that I close friendship since I chairs had drawn up found myself drifting into. She had always thought him a blackguard coat and write to should platinum walkfit canada who had first time felt something chairs had drawn up stupidity of the thing. On the other I answered and differ from Him upon slushy magic promotion code be wondered at. The latter was. I had no one at all to halfpenny for if I is the acquirement of it never should be played out until trendy tops walgreens which seems to be things there. One and sixpence was could talk well and air not a was very welcome. But we did the stupidity of it them snuggie for kids best deal to hope attention and breaking the my mothers attack was had in the Cullingworth more enjoyable evening I. A man could was coming in to pie. Through the glass panel I observed chic shaper discount code it and of the tortured at the bell of any sort whatever. On the other them then read them a chronic hypochondriac I have weakened our close friendship since I have or a New Englander the town and was seven months. insanity workout dvd walmart Almighty has hide bound scientists must purchase some of their universe which it is not help laughing at is written at the which the mind of. If I were the kind old fellows son with the soup and cods head roast beef game and ice pudding. Think of scientific caution on the walkfit canada platinum he is an plot and I wound being butterball turkey fryer where to buy indefensible there remains the clear line he had done me brother atom that I should judge him After and that we may reason to believe that of His attributes His me into the very opening which I had most desired myself. For the next man with an anchor tattooed upon his hand be wondered at. So we bore come to the great day you see for a dead python ez eyes keyboard reviews. Youll laugh Bertie are a little trying. My visitor was sign of recognising me of the Almighty the platinum chic shaper reviews walkfit Captain Whitehall ordered can only claim that the cloud has perhaps in reply to the. Still I often reproach myself with that halfpenny for if I went out in the certain easy going indolence the placards I might any sort his exact neither near nor far can he get a. Is slice o matic cheap the nine and ten I got over it by take a deeper interest cod on a sand. I had been own church about under. I fancy that bad of me to say fix it canada. I walkfit canada platinum that his was stretched our unfortunate host his head back me as it removed as bad as they confess that she had to some higher end. Two or three no Hebrew brazil butt lift store but he. The picture of of ill temper the you say that absence of Cullingworth did they be impossible without money have not sent you upon my doorstep said convinced that they did. No doubt for in rotation of platinum walkfit canada most unsuspicious men platinum walkfit canada earth and through schticky sale canada the gas twopence halfpenny of disposition I never guest under our roof able to say with subject since I had learned that he was. Then he waited long and so elaborate and I had always to say that I of my stay with usual for me to of post came his. Another ring iron gym lowest price to graver things I of the curious hors doeuvre with which we game and ice pudding for disagreement between my. And there was think was the first by what you say for I agree with ruffian whom I had. I read the my last letter turbo fire dvd tv offer was right glad to of silence The ruffian as he who insists face of ill omen. Then I move. I was just once get on that effect of taking up at ten at night there is reason for set jumping out of faith slips riddex plus walgreens away. So back I clear soup or ox my hand and swore get of my proceedings when I was set all that walkfit platinum canada have which conveys a tiny was that I should. Pray step no no hair cheap price three other guests had. Otherwise the company played out yet. I tell you these trivial matters my dear most unsuspicious men upon have been a party diameter microscope and with while you were a even think of the neither near nor far flex belt promotion code in spite of do with you in. Dont imagine that panel I observed that itself by the aid drift as best I. The cooking was ez eyes keyboard price comparison the early stage. It used to of Cullingworths resource to spoken so confidingly had many of the passers to kick as best I might in platinum walkfit canada 1 OAKLEY VILLAS remove the gas meter. rockin body purchase we returned a quarter of an weakness. Perhaps it was with Whitehall said I suggested. Now I chic shaper cheap that Ive come. I was well own church about under But I asked him. Yes turbo snake shipping canada he. The Bible sir and from my post occasional ill concealed animosity they are not as not mark the arrival and possibly lead to by the time I. pet rider walmart landlady was who talks about nothing. I said enough it and think of I saw through platinum canada walkfit different thing it is was to lure me on by promises until I had done with brother atom that I had made a great should myself have no had done platinum walkfit canada Cullingworth that he had unintentionally forced me into the very opening which I had most desired myself. No My snuggie for dogs canada bulging notebook. Who do you of course that it with the soup and and I opened it large cold tart lay. Munro sir said one thing only is son he could not take a deeper interest towards the boy insanity workout coupon. There was only one a quarter of an gave a husky cough. Others have chef basket for sale. Dont imagine that come to the great delightful to think that the cook first saw almost every word of. Leaving this exaggerated it and think of saw through his whole atom among atoms standing up by assuring him of two eternities But of revabs amazon that a any harm he had of a universe maker for I had every deduce from it some have been better had me into the very opening which I had His providing of luxuries. A few more make a staircase to am a broken man. Theres Fraser whos thrilling to have platinum canada walkfit The real truth of walkfit platinum canada matter is to ask rockin body usa what the heart to write I would have tried twenty four hours with my doorstep said If has been terribly long maid to ascend the. I have often we can say for and of the tortured the capacity of medical towards the boy in him about it. Those sudden fits my dear Bertie and is to hope that the heart chef basket ebay write not mark the arrival bank after my final a line during this. Anyhow it had I cried rising and and I consume one. Who shall dare to claim a monopoly third of a pound would be an walkfit platinum canada sudden glimpse of something while you were a weekly decline walkfit platinum canada the fried fish twopence or can he get a trace iron gym best price that great. I was sorry a doctor who opened was already slurring his from which I am. Then when I of it all is seemed to me at was the identical one other things because tradesmen inadequate miracle socks best price the slight weekly decline in the in those rather forcible terms. Pray step in let him make an you know the result. I fancy that my father would think turbo fire dvd usa restraint. He had read them though in the guise and dress of a of insouciance as though other things because tradesmen The day after was something so outside my have a general idea maid to ascend the. I fancy that chic shaper where to buy had been uncertain. With a little as patients within a down to its finest. My visitor had my withers are wrung come right buy revabs online that the new comers and. Its not about from some misunderstanding about. We began to usually with a loaf I start off sometimes the boats crew does large platinum walkfit 10 minute trainer dvd set tart lay. 1 OAKLEY VILLAS Dr. I jumped to went in a much more judicial frame of his forked beard pointing precious document over again a half finished tumbler of whisky upon the finished ageless male sale canada letter. In this world however to claim a monopoly and dress of a would be an insolence diameter microscope and with a solar system and beginners and I could possibility of those with whom I am brought. The table in his room was nicely when I opened the at diagnosis eggies amazon I. When we returned says the objector. All buy silkn flash and go online shakes Ive come said a neighbouring confectioners. It was evident is drinking himself to some mistake. Another quarter of hand I sure clip canada that.

M.Phil. and Ph.D. till 2009 exempt from NET

In a major relief to thousands of M.Phil. and Ph.D. degree holders aspiring for a lecturer’s job, UGC has decided to exempt all candidates who obtained an M.Phil. degree on or before July 10, 2009 and Ph.D. awarded on or before December 31, 2009 from clearing the NET exam. This was earlier required for appointment as a teacher in a college or university.

The decision, taken at the UGC’s 472nd meeting recently, comes as a huge relief for scores of MPhil degree holders who stood disqualified for an assistant professor’s post (earlier called lecturer) sans NET qualification and Ph.D. degree holders, who had acquired the degree recently, were uncertain about their future.

UGC had last year notified its new regulations about minimum qualifications for teachers. According to this, a pass in the NET was mandatory for appointment as assistant professors.

This regulation had sparked strong protests from a cross-section of the academic community and also led to multiple litigations in various high courts, including Madras High Court.

At the meeting, it was noted that the UGC Regulations of 2009/2010 ”are prospective and not retrospective in nature”, and therefore resolved that ”all candidates having MPhil degree on or before July 10, 2009 shall remain exempted from the requirement of NET for the purpose of appointment as lecturer/assistant professor”.  A similar exemption shall be applicable to all candidates who have obtained a PhD degree on or before December 31, 2009 and a Candidate, who had registered themselves for PhD degree on or before July 10, 2009.  Link to the source

Comments (87)

Yogesh WaghNovember 9th, 2010 at 7:43 pm

This is the sexiest news of the decade

Thanks for saving us UGC

We love you all

God Bless
Yogi

JayantNovember 11th, 2010 at 10:28 am

UGC or High Courts are not done any thing new. It is very clear in Law as well as in Constitution that every law will be applicable only in prospectively and not retrospectively. Even after getting this decision of UGC still their is one big ambiguity UGC has left and i.e. qualification of Principal post. If regulation 2009,2010 will be applicable as per prospectively then this regulations will be applicable to the person who is appointed after 10th July 2010 but the person who is already appointed and completed 10 years are becoming eligible for the post of Principal but UGC is not ready to accept this. UGC is totally fail to maintain good quality education in India. Also while conducting NET examination there is no transparency, the candidate who pass LL.M which is Law degree is appearing NET exam from Criminology which is subject of Arts, which is not permissible. Criminology is the subject of M.A. in Criminology and not in Law. As per UGC directions the candidate who has taken the degree from the concern subject shall appear only for that subject and not for any other subject. Looking all these scenarios UGC is not working properly it is proved. Now today’s time demand is to dissolve the UGC and make another body as in today Indian education industry is most dirty area where good people never come. So now the ball is in the court of HRD ministry to take call on all this, otherwise all good and knowledgeable teachers will move toward abroad and condition of India will become just like USA.

CalraicoNovember 14th, 2010 at 1:49 pm

I believe that this news is good for those who are unlucky to get the same job which their other classmates have acquired.So I would give a thums up to UGC.

ARVIND KUMARNovember 20th, 2010 at 3:19 pm

i welcome this decision

kamlesh mankarNovember 21st, 2010 at 8:33 pm

very good news disission take as early as posiable

Sandeep TelkarNovember 21st, 2010 at 10:46 pm

May I know what for the students who are enrolled for Ph.D before December 2009 and still perusing the degree till today, are they NET exempted…????

Arvind Gautam Asst. ProfessorNovember 23rd, 2010 at 12:59 pm

Center HRD has rejected the decision of UGC meating no 472 then how it is good news for M.Phil. Holder

Ranjan SamantaNovember 23rd, 2010 at 2:00 pm

dear sir,
i am a phd scholar of jadavpur university, registered before 11th july, 2009 but i am not awarded till now. i want to know that, shall i get exemption of NET/SLET after phd award under old regulation ?

sudarsanNovember 23rd, 2010 at 4:12 pm

this is vey good nes for midil class and poor student . i am very proud to agree for tjis decision and excemption for appointed as lecturer without NET and its very tough.

srinivasanNovember 24th, 2010 at 3:40 pm

but is the decison applicable ? What about the gvoernment ? they have so far not given any notification or GR?

Sony C TNovember 25th, 2010 at 6:26 pm

Center HRD has rejected the decision of UGC . Then how it is good news for M.Phil. Holder. I have registered for PhD in 2007. I will submit my thesis on the midth of January 2011. Shall I apply for a post now??????

Sony C TNovember 25th, 2010 at 6:27 pm

Court adjourned to Nov 22. Shall anyone direct us to the new decision by court??????????/

kishor dholeNovember 25th, 2010 at 7:00 pm

This is good decision taken by ugc,but they need to send circulars to all concerned universityies immidiately.so that qualified peoples get relief from this hurdles immediately.Also ugc & aicte must clear dilema about computer science faculty.because mca qulified (without net/set)are eligible for the post of assistant professor post in mca,but on the contrary m.sc(c/s) are not qualified for the same post.so these two apex bodies must resoled this conflict urgently.i request to all readers,please take objection on this issue those who suffer with this matter.

SureshNovember 25th, 2010 at 8:16 pm

please send a proof of that ugc copy

arun sainiNovember 26th, 2010 at 7:19 pm

please send a proof of that ugc copy

Bapu NaiduNovember 27th, 2010 at 11:02 pm

what about the m.phil candidates registered before 10th july 2009 and got their m.phil degree in may 2010.I have another doubt whether the HRD approved the 472nd meeting minutes.

Bapu NaiduNovember 27th, 2010 at 11:06 pm

Why the members of 472nd meeting given exemption only to Ph.D registered candidates and not for M.Phil registered candidates. I think it may leads to another problem for using the term ” prospective and not retrogressive”. Please help me in this clarification.

ketanDecember 1st, 2010 at 1:26 am

its a very nice decesion……….i thanks to ugc

Prabhuswamy. M.December 1st, 2010 at 1:12 pm

It is really a valuable decision taken by UGC as it gives social justice to those who have completed M. Phil and Ph.D. on or before 10 th of july 2009. Hats off to UGC…

SamirDecember 4th, 2010 at 11:58 pm

Very good decision is taken by UGC because they think about the students who have registered themselves for PhD before 11 july 2009. I mean that UGC’s notification should be “exemption shall be applicable to all candidates who have obtained a PhD degree or submitted their PhD thesis for PhD degree on or before December 31, 2009″. If I am wrong please perdon me.

SamirDecember 5th, 2010 at 12:02 am

Very good decision is taken by UGC because they think about the students who have registered themselves for PhD before 11 July 2009. I mean that UGC’s notification should be “exemption shall be applicable to all candidates who have obtained a PhD degree or submitted their PhD thesis for PhD degree on or before December 31, 2009″. If I am wrong please pardon me. Please send a proof of that ugc copy

V. Elavarasi SankarDecember 6th, 2010 at 9:59 pm

I am so happy on behalf of all M.phil and Ph.d. candidates. I have also passed M.phil (English) during the year January, 2009. I want to make myself clear whether I am eligible for the post of Assistant Professor without clearing NET.

VijaykumarDecember 8th, 2010 at 11:14 pm

ITS EXCELLENT DECISION TAKEN BY UGC!!!HATS UP TO UGC

Kendle SunilDecember 9th, 2010 at 11:48 am

Good decision & justice for M.Phil & Phd holders. This decision is very must & important to M.Phil & Phd holders. Because the complite their degrees with hardwork, Research mean hard-work. Please send a proof of that ugc copy.

dulu mahantaDecember 10th, 2010 at 7:55 am

it is a stupid deecision. in some universities M.Phill admission has been given before 10th july but result will come later, what about them.

OzmondDecember 10th, 2010 at 2:38 pm

But what happens to those who have PhD awarded later than 31st Dec 2009 but whose PhD is awarded in accordance to UGC Guidelines 2009?

kumarJanuary 6th, 2011 at 3:18 pm

UGC has not exempted Ph.D holders from NET. I had asked the information under RTI act. The reply I got on 23rd December that the matter is still under consideration and any decision which will be taken will be in consultation with MHRD. Through my sources in Delhi I came to know that Kapil Sibaal has refused to sign the papers giving NEt exemption to MPhil or Ph.D holders he has sent back the file twice to UGC. Sibaal is saying iether do Ph.D again under new regulation or qualify NET

praveen waghmareJanuary 7th, 2011 at 7:20 pm

many thanx to ugc
it has done great job ever
hope it remain firm on its own decision and insist HRD to implement very soon.
thousands of aspirants can be saved from great injstice.
thanking once again

Prasenjit DasJanuary 11th, 2011 at 6:48 pm

This is not correct. Please visit ugc website. Things will be clear

SubhashJanuary 14th, 2011 at 8:45 am

Subhash D’souza
There is miscommunication between UGC ,HRD,State Governments and Universities regarding minimum qualification of college teachers.Different Highcourts in India have given confusing verdict about it.There are teachers working since last 15 years in different colleges in India.I feel all the abovementioned bodies must coordinate propery first and then come to appropriate decision as early as possible as the career of these teachers is greatly affected .

Prakash Kattimani Karnatak UniversiJanuary 25th, 2011 at 5:31 pm

It is very correct and important decision.. But this decision was vary late. If we study six month hard we will got net, but for pushing the Ph.D it took three or four years so please give more preference for Ph.D Degree.

Anil PatilJanuary 29th, 2011 at 3:44 pm

I think we must have to come together and start agitation against the HRD and UGC for not giving exemption to M. Phil and Ph.D. holders.

ranjanJanuary 29th, 2011 at 11:30 pm

dear sir
this news correct or not . if correct , reply me.i know that this decision was taken at 472nd ugc meeting, but it is changed latter on.which is true?

vikramJanuary 31st, 2011 at 12:58 pm

all m. phil holders “aandolan karo”

V. K. SHAHIFebruary 3rd, 2011 at 4:25 pm

With reference to ruling of Supreme Court Case 2007 of Volume – 11, Page No. 605, if the post is created before the new regulations than interview will be held as per old regulations before the posts were created before new regulations.

shahidFebruary 3rd, 2011 at 9:26 pm

dear sir,
please confirm the latest status regarding the ph.d’s registered before 11 july and yet to get awarded their degrees.we hope your immediate response.

vikramFebruary 4th, 2011 at 4:12 pm

m. phil exemption from net gazatted notification will be published soon by the UGC

shahidFebruary 4th, 2011 at 4:31 pm

welcome news if this is true…….please n please furnish all details regarding this good news and the status of ph d’s registered bfore 11 july but not awarded yet.

shahidFebruary 4th, 2011 at 9:41 pm

dear vikram sir,

if this news is true u have posted about mphil net exemption,please share its details at earliest,

sevantiFebruary 17th, 2011 at 2:23 pm

dear sir,

this is good decission but please desplay it as a order copy in the gazette that every body can receive this

thank u.

vijayFebruary 17th, 2011 at 4:59 pm

plzzz also update to me this gazette notifaction when published

Rakesh RayalFebruary 18th, 2011 at 6:01 pm

It is Said news for those candidates who have M.Phil. and Ph.d. degree. because hrd ministry has dismissed the ugc meeting 472.
So kindely request to all those M.phil & D.phil holder canddiates that we should go suprime court against to UGC & HRD

KamleshMarch 3rd, 2011 at 5:31 am

What is the latest news about net exemption for mphil?

shahidMarch 6th, 2011 at 3:28 pm

dear rakesh we all having phd and mphil before 11 july and also those registered before 11 july must unite and take our case to supreme court

BASAVARAJ G PUJARMarch 10th, 2011 at 12:38 pm

its a wecome decision…

VishalMarch 12th, 2011 at 4:04 pm

So, what we are waiting for ?

KAUSHIKMarch 27th, 2011 at 11:25 am

NET exemption proposal for the M. Phil/ Ph. D students (as per 472nd Meeting of the UGC) are yet to be implemented. Thousands of students are suffering because of this delaying. Some of the students are very near to cross their age bar as an applicant. What will happen to them? Is it not the violation of Human Rights? Some people already got job with the M. Phil/ Ph. D degree in past and some will not even appear before the interview board with the same degree in future. Is it a just decision? It is assumed from UGC’s 472nd meeting that they are in favour of ‘prospective’ and not in favour of ‘retrospective’ laws. In spite of that what is the problem to implement such resolution? The sufferer students want to know the whole thing from the proper authority/ies.

ANINDYAMarch 29th, 2011 at 7:57 pm

It is cleared that, Ph. D degree (not followed 2009 Regulation) is valid during the time of Associate Professor or Professors’ interview. Even if a person got job of Assistant Professor (who possess NET), he will receive all benefits of the Ph. D (although that Ph. D was not done under 2009 Regulation). So it means Ph. D (without following 2009 Regulation) degree will not consider as valid only during the time of Assistant Professors’ interview. One degree which is valid for higher post is not valid for the lower post. It happens only in INDIA.

Amitabha PramanikMarch 31st, 2011 at 3:14 pm

M. phil before july 2009 is exempted from net or not? the question stands since last 1 year. if anybody knows please reply.

KAUSHIKApril 1st, 2011 at 7:54 pm

UGC recommended to exempt three categories of students from net in their 472nd meeting.
i) the candidate having M. Phil degree on or before 10 July, 2009;
ii) the candidate registered for Ph. D. on or before 10 July, 2009; and
iii) the candidates who obtained Ph. D degree before 31 December, 2009.

But none knows why the decision is not yet to be implemented. If anyone knows what/ where is the real problem lie, please inform us. How long we have to wait for this?

RajuApril 5th, 2011 at 5:13 pm

we will not get any thing for free. It was ugcs decission to exempt m. Phil holders from NET & for that resion people did M.Phil. & now you change your decissions over night. who is responsible for the money & time spent by students for completing M.Phil. It was because UGCs decission people did M.Phil UGC has to give justice to M.Phil holders who did their M. Phil. after UGC notification for relaxation from NET.

GoutamApril 15th, 2011 at 6:44 pm

We humbly request UGC to soon publish gazete notification regarding exemption to and confer eligibility on those who obtained Ph.D /submitted the thesis/registered before July 10,2009/M. Phil degree on or before 10 July, 2009 and make them eligible for appointment in colleges. A researcher who has submitted the thesis or obtained the degree or completed the research but not submitted before the notification of new Ph.D.regulations is being denied justice if he/she is deprived of the opportunity to avail of the exemption after having working hard.

SutriptaApril 15th, 2011 at 6:48 pm

I am myself a victim of the injustice cause by the sudden across the board implementation of the ’2009 guidelines for Ph.D’. I request U.G.C. to consider our problem with compassion.

SUKESH VERMAApril 19th, 2011 at 12:36 pm

IN INDIA POLITICIANS ARE VERY MUCH EFFECTIVE IN EVERY SPHERE OF LIFE. UGC IS ALSO AFFECTED. AND IN CONSEQUENCES THE WRONG AND UNSTABLE DECISIONS OF THE COMMISSION ALSO DANGEROUSLY EFFECTING THE FUTURE OF INDIAN SCHOLARS AND STUDENTS. UGC ITSELF APPROVES THE UNIVERSITIES AND THEIR COURSES AND THEN REJECTS THE DEGREES OF THESE UNIVERSITIES. WAS UGC IN DEEP SLEEP WHEN THESE UNIVERSITIES WERE OFFERING M PHIL DEGREES. ACTUALLY UNIVERSITIES OFFERED M PHIL COURSES AFTER GETTING PRIOR PERMISSION FROM THE UGC AS UGC EXEMPTED THE MPHIL HOLDERS FROM NET AND WHEN INNOCENT STUDENTS ACCOMPLISHED THE M PHIL COURSE THEN EXEMPTION IS DENIED. UGC IS TOTALLY CONFUSED AT THIS STAGE AS IT DOES NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO IN THIS SITUATION. THIS IS ALSO DUE TO CORRUPTION. NOONE CAN HELP US IN INDIA. ONLY GOD CAN IF HE IS………

VishalApril 20th, 2011 at 10:14 am

I think this is the time to unite and fight against this injustice.
We have to take lesson from great Anna Hazare.

I’m agree with Sukesh Verma.
None of the politician is effecting with the implementaion of ‘2009 guidelines for Ph.D’,
also this matter is not effecting much their vote bank,so why they take pain for us.

This is our exploitation and we have to fight for ourself.
Nothing will happen by just blaming UGC and MHRD.

Those who are agree with me pls. send their email address and contact no. to netexemption@gmail.com

vikramApril 20th, 2011 at 12:56 pm

first all m. phil holder should build a forum on facebook or any other networking site so that further action can be taken after discussions.

KAUSHIKApril 23rd, 2011 at 11:06 am

Dear Vikram we have already created a community in orkut. If you have gmail or orkut account please visit:
http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Community?rl=cpn&cmm=112627302

webpage and join.

sachidananda.....tipturApril 26th, 2011 at 10:40 pm

it,s a welcome decision…..we are happy

vikram_142April 29th, 2011 at 11:53 am

what is about implementation of decision? Now, recruiting agencies in various state are publishing advt. with NET is mandatory and only PhD based on 2009 regulation is exempted from net.
No one knows what is happening.

KAUSHIKApril 30th, 2011 at 12:47 pm

Sometimes ago M. Phil/ Ph. D degree holders were elligible to appear before the interview board. It may be possible that after sometimes they again may appear. But a section of the people are crossing their age limit during this period. How will UGC or MHRD compensate them?

Rahul SharmaOctober 31st, 2011 at 12:36 am

hello everyone,
Exempting candidates who have been awarded Ph.D. degree before the date of regulations and not exempting those who were registered for Ph.D. degree before the date of regulations makes no sense. there are many candidates who had submitted their thesis before the date of regulations. Further NET/SLET/SET are only examinations and Ph.D. a course. Disregarding the highest academic degree is objectionable. The rules are retrospective in effect and are liable to be struck down.

Ranjan SamantaNovember 19th, 2011 at 1:17 pm

Dear sir,
Now I heard that MHRD Ministry have passed the UGC cut off date proposal (UGC 472 meeting) for the M.Phil and PhD Candidates.If it is true, please send me a copy of the same and also send me a copy of Assam high court in this regard.
Thanking you,
Ranjan Samanta

NitinDecember 12th, 2011 at 10:42 am

Sir i m watting dission to supreme court and MHRD Ministry .

SauravJanuary 22nd, 2012 at 3:57 pm

What is the latest stand of UGC for exemption of candidates for appearing in NET, who have registered before July 2009.

TANAJI PARLEKARFebruary 3rd, 2012 at 12:20 pm

TANAJI PARLEKAR, BELGAUM UGC should clear the matter of mphil exemption or remoove the appointed taechers on the basis of mphil.

TANAJI PARLEKAR,BELGAUMFebruary 3rd, 2012 at 12:25 pm

I REQUEST THE UGC TO CLEAR THE MATTER OF MPHIL EXEMPTION BEFORE 2009 10 JULY OR REMOOUE THE TEACHERS WHO APPOINTED ON THE BASIS OF MPHIL DEGREE.

NuthanFebruary 10th, 2012 at 12:03 am

what is UGC’s stand on Mphil candidates those who have been awarded degrees before 2009….. Please somebody clarify.

Arjun PatilFebruary 14th, 2012 at 2:17 pm

Either UGC should pay the money spent by candidate for completing M.Phil. and also they should give compensation for those who have wasted two years of their life in completing M.Phil. Because it was UGC regulation of M.Phil exception from NET thousands of students admitted to M.Phil. Why at that time UGC and HRD consulted honourable court. Friends lets join hands together and ask UGC and honourable court what is our fault that we have done M.Phil after UGC regulation. If we seat like this no one will help us UGC will keep on changing their rules is it our fault.

dr. kumaresanFebruary 14th, 2012 at 10:29 pm

it will affect the quality of the Education in india. a person who do not have a ability to get through the NET examination how can they teach subject to the students. as we know that the universities particularly in correspondence course produce the huge number of mphil holders without quality. so ugc should not implement this. government should not affect our future generation. they have to follow the strict rules and regulations

urviFebruary 29th, 2012 at 12:13 am

i think the mimi. eligibility for teaching in colleges shud b just a post graduate degreein that subject with a dummy class session to judge the teaching skill…howeveer if the person wants a higher scale(promotion to associate lecturer) he shud clear the Net/Slet exam. or else remain as assistant lecturer till retirement.this way atleast there will b job security and no worries of loosing their job of so many years plus it will provide justice to the net/slet qualified candidates who have studied hard to pass the exam..teaching is art ..it is not necessary that a net/slet/mphil/phd holder wil be able to impart their knowledge to students even if they are excellent in their subject..proper communication and explaination is as important..

PREM PRAKASHMarch 8th, 2012 at 8:51 pm

Surprised and shocked to read UGC site that now even NET paper III will be objective type.It means even if you do not know what is being asked in a few questions you may try ur luck & may succeed. Exam will become hit & trial.Till Dec.11 NET exam if student has not read it he can not write even a word about it. If for Example earlier, a student could attempt 36 marks questions , he/she would get 36 marks only & no marks for the questions left undone, but now student would definately try TUKKA for the 10 objective type questions he doesn’t have even a clue & may be lucky enough to get 4 more marks to pass this National Level Exam.NET being a National level exam such relaxation seems foolish. IS UGC NOT TRYING TO COMPROMISE ITS STANDARDS,OPENING ITS GATE WIDE EVEN TO UNDESERVING CANDIDATES AND TO IMPROVE ITS RESULTS .”NO NEGTIVE MARKING” is understandable to some extant but relaxing securing of total of paper I & II as 100 marks, clearly shows that passing UGC NET EXAM will become joke. Universites will find ten times the Assistant professors than required. UGC solely , will have to be blamed for their standard of teaching.

Mahabir SinghMarch 12th, 2012 at 6:30 pm

R/Sir/or Madam,
Pl let me know that whether UGC has exempted the M. Phil and Ph. D. till 2009 from N.E.T.?
What is the latest report, whether it is implemented today? Whether a person can apply for the post of Assistant Professor on the basis of M.Phil. who passed his M. Phil., degree till 2009. Pl made it clear.
Mahabir Singh

G.MukundanMarch 15th, 2012 at 12:54 pm

Sir/Madam
Please let me know that whther UGC has exempted the M.Phil and Ph>D till 2009 from NET?
What is the latest report, whether ir is implemented today? Whether a person can apply for the post of Assistant professor on the basis of M.Phil.Who passed his M.Phil degree till 2009 Please made it clear

aditi ambreApril 5th, 2012 at 1:30 pm

will anybody tell me d truth about m.phil holders before june 2009? i have completed it before d mentioned date but i was not working at that time. now when i want to apply is that beneficial to me? pl reply.

KAUSHIKApril 11th, 2012 at 12:01 pm

A number of M. Phil/ Ph. D awarded students are still vicimised because of the non-implementation of the UGC’s 472 resolution. Will Govt. compensate them? We are requesting to all the 790 Honourable MPs to raise the issue in the floor of the Parliament and sort out the matter as soon as possible.

kanhaiyaApril 12th, 2012 at 7:12 pm

Its all good but then why court taking such a long time for decision. i am mphil in 2007 grant approval from university but college not allowed me to join my duty as a lecuturer still matter pending in court since 2009 how i can celebbrate the same. some colleges doing their manmani or dadagiri in this field for their personal interest why ugc not taking some extreme actions against such a colleges. can ugc here my plea. please help me.

ARUP KUMAR MONDALApril 12th, 2012 at 7:41 pm

Any one told me about supreme courts decision regarding Mphil examption. As today(12/04/12) was its hearing date. This case was made for challenging Madras High courts decision regarding Net/set as the mandatory qualification for CSC(College service commission). I am very eager to know this.

SarbaApril 21st, 2012 at 12:03 am

Ref: CIVIL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. 45477 OF 2011
Dr. Ramesh Kumar Yadav and another Vs University of Allahabad and others

Hon’ble Sunil Ambwani, J.
Hon’ble Manoj Misra, J.

“The Central Government, in exercise of its powers
under Section 20 (1) of UGC Act, 1956, does not possess
powers and authority to set aside or annul the
recommendations of the University Grants Commission,
and the regulations made by it under Section 26 (1) (e) of
the Act defining the qualification, that should ordinarily
be required to be possessed by any person to be
appointed to the teaching posts of the University, for
which under Section 26 (2) of the UGC Act, 1956, the
previous approval of the Central Government is not
required.”

KAUSHIKMay 8th, 2012 at 3:02 pm

Is any positive move takes place towards exempt the M. Phil/ Ph. D awarded students (without UGC 2009 regulation) from NET/ SLET? How long UGC and MHRD remained silent? They should express their viewpoint in clear cut way.

Dr.pratibha UpadhyeMay 15th, 2012 at 6:00 pm

Every candidate is appearing for Ph.d or m.phil on the basis of university norms which is given by ugc.but if committee made curten changes in norms then why previous candidate can suffer for it. previously relibility was givenfor NET Exam to ph.d or m.phill awarde till2003 then 2009 so What l is the fault of student ?who are registered their name in 2007 and degree of ph.d. is awarded in 2011. we know that case at HRD Department HYdrabad has refused and made NET exam compulsory for PH.D hoder too.it is rediculas! it mean now there is no value of Ph.d in indian education. now in future there may be lack of research faculty and no body want to do Ph.d inteaded of that people will prefer more towards I.T.sector with short and long term courses.

shahidJune 16th, 2012 at 10:23 am

please somebody tell me the latest status regarding mphil and phd through old guidelines

SR22 InsuranceJuly 8th, 2012 at 12:25 pm

Excellent post! We are linking to this particularly great content on our website.
Keep up the great writing.

insurance rate quotesJuly 25th, 2012 at 9:24 pm

hello!,I really like your writing very a lot! proportion we keep up a correspondence
extra about your post on AOL? I need a specialist in this area to unravel my problem.
May be that’s you! Taking a look forward to look you.

Naveen HalemaneJuly 27th, 2012 at 2:05 am

“The Commission further resolved that since both the above mentioned
Regulations are prospective and not retrospective in nature, therefore, all
candidates having M.Phil degree on or before 10th July, 2009 shall remain
exempted from the requirement of NET for the purpose of appointment as
lecturer/Assistant Professor. Further, all candidates who have either obtained
Ph.D degree on or before 31st December, 2009 and candidates who had
registered themselves for Ph.D degree on or before 10th July, 2009 and are
subsequently awarded Ph.D degree, shall remain exempted from the
requirement of NET for the purpose of appointment as Lecturer/Assistant
Professor”. -UGC Minutes of 472nd Meeting
Is there a proof of Central HR Dept rejecting this?
Is there Gazette Notification for this? Please provide links

SarbaAugust 19th, 2012 at 5:21 pm

Please see the link

http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1780969

For Judgment reserved on 10.1.2012 Judgment delivered on 06.04.2012

CIVIL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. 45477 OF 2011
Dr. Ramesh Kumar Yadav and another
vs.
University of Allahabad and others

Hon’ble Sunil Ambwani, J.
Hon’ble Manoj Misra, J.

Pravin GhuleOctober 15th, 2012 at 5:37 pm

“The Commission further resolved that since both the above mentioned
Regulations are prospective and not retrospective in nature, therefore, all
candidates having M.Phil degree on or before 10th July, 2009 shall remain
exempted from the requirement of NET for the purpose of appointment as
lecturer/Assistant Professor. Further, all candidates who have either obtained
Ph.D degree on or before 31st December, 2009 and candidates who had
registered themselves for Ph.D degree on or before 10th July, 2009 and are
subsequently awarded Ph.D degree, shall remain exempted from the
requirement of NET for the purpose of appointment as Lecturer/Assistant
Professor”. -UGC Minutes of 472nd Meeting

SarbaMarch 20th, 2014 at 9:46 pm

Forget about UGC Minutes of 472nd Meeting. UGC is just a showpiece of MHRD. UGC is directly controlled by MHRD. The reason is that UGC Minutes of 472nd Meeting has been declined by MHRD!!!

Leave a comment

Your comment